Disclaimer: This website is not an official GS1 publication and is currently in development. The content, mappings, and AI-generated responses are for testing and demonstration purposes only and should not be used for compliance decisions or official reporting. Always refer to official GS1 documentation and regulatory texts for authoritative information.
Analysis generated by ISA's AI to help you understand how this news affects GS1 standards and your operations.
CSDDD compliance relies heavily on identifying business partners (GLN) and tracing products and materials (GTIN, SSCC) across the supply chain. EPCIS is crucial for capturing auditable event data regarding sourcing, processing, and transportation, providing the necessary evidence for due diligence reports required under the ESRS linked to CSRD.
The European Parliament formally adopted the CSDDD, compelling large companies to identify and mitigate adverse human rights and environmental impacts across their entire value chains. This final approval triggers the transposition phase for EU member states, requiring affected companies to immediately begin preparing for mandatory comprehensive due diligence processes.
The CSDDD was widely expected to pass, but its final scope and timeline remained subject to political negotiation and potential last-minute changes until the final vote was cast. Companies assumed they had more lead time before the legal obligation was cemented, potentially delaying significant compliance investments.
The formal adoption confirms the directive's binding legal status at the EU level, eliminating uncertainty regarding its eventual implementation and mandating that member states transpose it into national law. The requirement for granular, auditable data across the supply chain is now a confirmed legal necessity for large companies.
The CSDDD has transitioned from a high-probability legislative proposal to a fully enacted EU law, meaning the compliance obligation is now fixed and unavoidable for in-scope entities. The focus shifts immediately from lobbying or monitoring to active preparation, data system overhaul, and supply chain mapping to meet the new due diligence standards.
The fundamental goal of the directive—to hold large corporations accountable for human rights and environmental abuses in their supply chains—remains consistent with earlier drafts. The core principles of due diligence, risk assessment, and mitigation are stable.
Stakeholders must accelerate investment in supply chain transparency tools, likely leveraging GS1 standards (like GTINs, GLNs) to ensure auditable, granular data linkage between products, locations, and sustainability attributes. Legal and compliance teams must finalize gap analyses and begin restructuring procurement contracts to enforce CSDDD requirements on suppliers immediately.